The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the state of Idaho sex reassignment surgery to inmate Adree Edmo.

The panel of three judges agreed with Federal District Judge B. Lynn Winmill鈥檚 ruling in Edmo鈥檚 favor last December, writing that his findings were 鈥渓ogical and well-supported鈥� and that 鈥渞esponsible prison officials were deliberately indifferent to Edmo鈥檚 gender dysphoria, in violation of the Eighth Amendment.鈥�

[ ]

That means Edmo will be the first transgender inmate in the nation to receive sex reassignment surgery through a court order. The ruling could have a ripple effect in western states and potentially across the nation, as prison officials grapple with the rights of transgender inmates and their medical needs.

Idaho Gov. Brad Little (R) called the ruling 鈥渆xtremely disappointing鈥� and that the state will appeal the case to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Edmo is diagnosed with gender dysphoria, which can cause a person severe distress stemming from being born in a body that does not match their gender identity.

Treatments for gender dysphoria can vary 鈥� some people experience relief by dressing in their desired gender and receiving hormone treatments. Others require more medically intensive transition-related care, such as mastectomies or gender confirmation surgery.

鈥�...prison authorities have not provided that treatment despite full knowledge of Edmo鈥檚 ongoing and extreme suffering and medical needs,鈥� the judges wrote.  

Out of desperation, Edmo has twice attempted self-castration while in prison to try to alleviate her symptoms of gender dysphoria and more closely conform her physical body to her gender identity.

The ruling doesn鈥檛 mean that the Idaho Department of Correction will now have to provide gender confirmation surgery to all transgender inmates. Rather, it sets a standard for providing the surgery to certain inmates who experience severe gender dysphoria and for whom the surgery is deemed medically necessary.

The federal district judge ruled in Edmo鈥檚 favor in December 2018 and ordered the prison to provide the surgery. In January 2019, . Now that the 9th Circuit has agreed with the lower judge, the state and Corizon will have to move forward with arranging for the procedure, which can cost between $20,000 and $30,000.

A temporary stay halting the procedure will lift in a few weeks, according to her lawyers, pending the state鈥檚 appeal.

Edmo is serving a 10-year sentence for sexually abusing a 15-year-old boy when she was 22. Edmo is scheduled for release in 2021 and is not eligible for parole. Per Idaho Department of Correction policy, she will be transferred to a state women鈥檚 prison following the surgery.

The state of Idaho has 90 days to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. In a statement, Little wrote, 鈥淲e cannot divert critical public dollars away from the higher priorities of keeping the public safe and rehabilitating offenders.鈥�

鈥淭he hardworking taxpayers of Idaho should not be forced to pay for a convicted sex offender鈥檚 gender reassignment surgery when it is contrary to the medical opinions of the treating physician and multiple mental health professionals,鈥� he wrote.

But the 85-page opinion from the 9th Circuit repeatedly rejected those opinions from Edmo鈥檚 healthcare providers.

鈥淚t is enough that [her doctor] knew of and disregarded an excessive risk to Edmo鈥檚 health by rejecting her request for [gender confirmation surgery] and then never re-evaluating his decision despite ongoing harm to Edmo,鈥� the judges wrote.

Despite the fact that two other physicians agreed with the original treatment plan, the ruling found that 鈥済eneral agreement in a medically unacceptable form of treatment does not somehow make it reasonable.鈥�

Edmo鈥檚 lead attorney, Lori Rifkin, called the news of the appeal 鈥渦nfortunate鈥� and 鈥渞eprehensible.鈥�

鈥淪he suffers every single day while they have denied this treatment to her for years and there can be no reason justifying Idaho鈥檚 continued refusal to provide her care except bias,鈥� Rifkin said.

This issue could be timely for Supreme Court. In two similar cases in the 5th and the 1st Circuit Courts of Appeals, judges ruled against inmates requesting gender confirmation surgery, and with this decision there鈥檚 now a split in the circuit courts. That could make it more likely that the Supreme Court would consider the case.

The 9th Circuit explicitly rejected the 5th Circuit鈥檚 opinion, which found that denying an inmate gender confirmation surgery could not violate the 8th Amendment. Friday鈥檚 ruling found that the 5th Circuit鈥檚 decision, 鈥淩elies on an incorrect, or at best outdated, premise: that 鈥榌t]here is no medical consensus that [gender confirmation surgery] is a necessary or even effective treatment for gender dysphoria.鈥欌€�

This is a developing story. Please check back frequently for updates.